Published research.A starting point for your next paper.

How a trial presents its eligibility criteria, treatment groups, endpoints and safety reporting.

Explore how an Earth-system forecasting study presents its model, evaluation and supporting methods.

Examine the reporting of a workplace experiment, including the study design, outcome measures and limits of interpretation.

See how a computational biology paper connects a technical method with benchmarks and research findings.

How a marketing study defines engagement and connects content characteristics with audience behaviour.

How survey measures, demographic differences and model choices shape a financial-literacy study.

How an education meta-analysis defines interventions, combines outcomes and explores differences between studies.

How a cross-art comparison defines aesthetic emotions and uses participant reports to explore them.

The description of an optical sensing system, its experimental setup and potential biological applications.

The connection between an observed signal, physical modelling and quantified uncertainty.

How a technical overview organises treatment approaches and compares their practical constraints.

How field observations and modelling are combined to estimate an environmental problem at global scale.

How a legal argument distinguishes provisions, interpretation and policy. Read this dated contribution alongside later developments.

How information diffusion is measured and how topic categories support a comparison of news-sharing patterns.

How archaeological context, historical records and ancient DNA evidence contribute to a shared argument.

How a conceptual framework groups ethical questions and identifies areas for further investigation.

Consult the reporting checklist and flow diagrams when preparing a systematic review. Use the version required by your target journal.

Read the principles behind findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable research data, then consider how they apply to your data-sharing plan.

A practical reference for defining a review topic, searching the literature and developing a critical synthesis.

Compare the guidance with your review process: separate major methodological concerns from suggestions about presentation.

Review the sequence of your argument, from the research question to the evidence supporting your conclusion.

Use this article as a starting point for thinking through manuscript preparation and the publication process.

Audit whether each figure communicates one clear message, with readable labels and an informative caption.

Check whether each citation supports the statement beside it and whether you have consulted the original source.

Compare your draft with this writing guidance, focusing on clarity of argument and the purpose of each section.

Discuss the analysis plan and reporting choices with a qualified statistician before interpreting your results.

Check whether another researcher could follow your computational workflow using the information you provide.

How a multicentre intervention defines patient outcomes and reports differences between study periods.